A controversial home-building project on the oceanfront along Ocean Boulevard in Boca Raton is underway more than a year after the city agreed to stop long-running litigation over the matter.
Crews began clearing vegetation from the property at 2600 N. Ocean Boulevard (A1A) about a week ago and, this week, delivered heavy equipment that began driving pilings into the sand. The parcel is located east of A1A, on the ocean, about halfway between Spanish River Park and Red Reef Park, across the street from the TGM Oceana complex. In October 2024, the city council held a public hearing that lasted over three hours, representing the last occasion on which the city would take comment on the construction effort that had resulted in years of litigation.
Ultimately, at the hearing in late 2024, the council approved a scaled-down iteration of a proposal to build a residential home east of the Coastal Construction Control Line, citing the fact that a judge has already ruled that the property owner’s rights to develop the parcel remain intact after an initial denial by the city. The lot is being developed with a 2,776 square foot, single-family home.
Objectors to the project, at the time, argued it would set a precedent that could lead to further development along the ocean, and would negatively impact sea turtles and other marine life, as well as the dune line. Professionals testified on behalf of the property owner, however, that extraordinary measures – beyond virtually any taken in the entire state – to minimize impacts to the environment led to approval from the state Department of Environmental Protection for the development to move forward. Further, they said, the property owner has volunteered to remove all invasive and exotic plants from the dune line and replace them with native plants, representing the only section of beachfront in Boca Raton that will be free of non-native flora.
Ultimately, however, the wrangling over the project’s environmental impact were overcome by legal realities: litigation resulted in an affirmation of property rights to the parcel’s private owner, and a second denial of the application by the city council would have inevitably led to more litigation that city legal counsel said would have likely resulted in a court-ordered approval of the development and an order mandating taxpayers reimburse the owner’s legal fees.
Modifications from the original plan, introduced in 2019, reduced the building’s footprint from 3,080 square feet to 2,776 square feet; eliminated more than half of the building area, from 14,270 square feet to 6,931 square feet; reduced the height from 49 feet to 38 feet; and significantly dropped impervious coverage from 6,644 square feet to 2,776 square feet.
Despite a smaller size and a pledge from the owner to relocate a ground-level pool to the roof and build a driveway in an elevated position over the dune line so it would not be disturbed, some neighbors and environmental advocates called on the council to deny the application anyway.
“They own a lot on which construction is forbidden,” one neighboring resident said at the time. “Had they never purchased this lot, the special and unique condition disappears, since they never would have owned this property.”
Robert Sweetapple, the attorney representing the property owner, cast doubt on the motivation behind members of a nearby homeowners’ association objecting to the development.
“I understand, they don’t want to see a house,” he said. “They want to go to their private beach that their communities own on either side, and they want to enjoy their private beach, and they don’t want to see what my client does with his private property.”
Given the approvals the project had already received from the DEP, as well as a recommendation for city approval by the municipal staff, Sweetapple said environmental issues had already been settled. Likewise, he said, the circuit court upheld the right of the property owner to develop the lot even though they did not own it in the 1940s when it was subdivided.
“This whole conversation, for years, has been unpleasant,” Mayor Scott Singer said at the time. “My hand is, I feel, forced by several things – one, where a court is likely to go … litigation will continue, and perhaps the number of square feet could be whittled down – one foot, 100 feet, 1,000 feet – but we’re going to keep litigating and litigating and litigating, and we’re going to keep incurring expenses on both sides.”
The application was approved 4-1 by the governing body, with Councilman Andy Thomson casting the lone dissenting vote.
Follow Us on Facebook
Police, Fire & Courts
Police Arrest Suspect in Car Theft After Group Attempted Vehicle Break-Ins in Boca Raton
Police, Fire & Courts
Boca Teen Arrested in Fatal Hit-and-Run Accident That Claimed 17-Year-Old
Police, Fire & Courts
Woman Arrested in Alleged Strangulation, Battery Outside Boca Raton Movie Theater
Police, Fire & Courts
Woman Arrested in Alleged Strangulation, Battery Outside Boca Raton Movie Theater
Police, Fire & Courts
Boca Teen Arrested in Fatal Hit-and-Run Accident That Claimed 17-Year-Old






